DELP ARDE MEME Ub TRE NAW Y
2 fe
eee a, Sens
ror
me [roar caprreTinn a& MoV AD ROOORRE
701 8, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE TUL
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
TAL .
Docket No: 3775-14/
7713-11
19 December 2014
Dear Qa
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated
12 January 2014. You previously petitioned the Board and were
advised in our letter of 3 May 2012, that your application had
been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session on 17 December 2014. Documentary
material considered by the Board consisted of your application
and prior case file.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined your letter explaining the events
concerning your civil arrest even though not previously
considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the
existence of material error or injustice. The Board determined
your letter was nov enough to outweigh the significant misconduct
you committed while on active duty. Accordingly, your
application has been denied, The names and votes of the members
of the panel wili be furnished upon request.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorabie action camnot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official record, the burden is on Ec
applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or
injustice. ,
Sincerely,
ROBERT J. OC’ NETLE
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6136 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your letters, any material submitted in support of your application, and your prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire recoré, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7556 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application and any material submitted in support of your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10592 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6846 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. Bfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9942 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2014. is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8231 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 21 January 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5680 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the medical notes you submitted, © even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4632 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, .sitting in executive session. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined your assertion, that you had trouble with your younger brother, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient to establish the existence of material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3162 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the psychological evaluation notes you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5598 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and your previous case file. Consequently, when _applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.